| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Why complain about High Sec but not SOV mechanics? An honest look at null bears. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: we don't give a flying **** what's "good for the game"; our continued existence takes priority over all else And here we have the whole reason why they've been bleating for changes that benefit them over every other sectio...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.03.12 03:23:00
|
2. James 315 - An Apology and an Appeal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I for one hope James doesnt make CSM, if only for the reason that poses and gameplay outside hi-sec needs a look at. With his bleating clogging up the CSM, other much more worthwhile viewpoints from Eve wouldnt be heard. "Saving hi-sec" can and sh...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.02.14 18:19:00
|
3. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lol.. so basically this whole thread has boiled down to a whine about boring "sov mechanics", then a constant stream of comments saying how bad changes to the "broken sov mechanics" would be for the game and turns into defending the very thing tha...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.25 21:18:00
|
4. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Gianna Thirostin wrote: Not to mention the fact that any change that happens will mean they can benefit the most from those changes i disagree, but saying "changes" rather than anything specific doesn't leave much room...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.24 21:44:00
|
5. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Zloco Crendraven wrote: Dave Stark wrote: does that stop the issue of sov mechanics being **** any less of a fact? not in the slightest. Still, when there was no risk involved , it didnt stop anyone form sov grinding...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.24 21:33:00
|
6. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Null sec alliances creating content for their players: excellent because this is what this game is/should be about Alliances able to discuss and set some sort of "rules" so this doesn't become a tedious process no o...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.24 20:22:00
|
7. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: As demonstrated by the averted war between the CFC and the HBC, two coalitions who have been itching to shoot at each other for months, sov mechanics need to be fixed. Now. We're utterly fed up with dealing with timers a...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.24 18:50:00
|
8. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: If the leadership said it was because of sov, I'd certainly be interested to know where you saw it. I thought "because of sov" was the whole point of this thread...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.24 17:43:00
|
9. No need to fear: War between HBC and CFC averted - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: It is actually quite enlightening, now that their actions have proven how risk-adverse the null sec power blocs are. "Oh no's, we can't touch each other's infrastructure, because that would hurt." But given their propa...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.23 20:36:00
|
10. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Gianna Thirostin wrote: Every complaint about sov can be boiled down to one key idea: boredom. "Structure grinding sucks" "null is a nap/nip fest" "theres no conflict drivers" et al. Boredom caused by the current state of nul...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.23 19:13:00
|
11. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Every complaint about sov can be boiled down to one key idea: boredom. "Structure grinding sucks" "null is a nap/nip fest" "theres no conflict drivers" et al. Boredom caused by the current state of null politics (aka player generated content). If ...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.23 18:55:00
|
12. EVE's summer expansion better focus on sovereignty - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No More Heroes wrote: Docter Daniel Jackson wrote: I know this is a noobie thing to ask, but what u you get from 0.0 space anyways? other then planets moons and belts. anything worth fighting over? Not really. Technetium was the conflict...
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.23 18:25:00
|
13. FALSE ADVERTISING - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Obligatory "can I have your stuff" post
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2013.01.18 21:17:00
|
14. WTB - 1 or 2 Exhumer/Ice Miner pilots - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Thread closed, found the toons i'm looking for!
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 04:07:00
|
15. WTS Great Mining Toon - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Isk and evemail sent!
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 04:05:00
|
16. WTS Great Mining Toon - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
5Bil B/O
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 04:00:00
|
17. WTS 6.7M SP Exhumers/Ice Harvesting 5 Pilot. - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Isk and evemail sent
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 03:00:00
|
18. WTS 6.7M SP Exhumers/Ice Harvesting 5 Pilot. - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
3.5 B b/o online now!
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 02:44:00
|
19. WTS Hulk pilot - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
4B still online
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 01:37:00
|
20. WTS Hulk pilot - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
3.5B still online
- by Gianna Thirostin - at 2012.12.12 01:33:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |